EndlessWait
01-13 12:01 PM
???
wallpaper Trendy Short Hairstyles 2010,
GoneSouth
07-27 10:39 AM
Thought folks might find the following interesting.
I recently returned from a visit to Canada where I stayed with my brother-in-law, who owns a small but very successful web development shop. He told me that due to the booming Canadian economy, he can no longer find experienced programmers at reasonable bill rates. So he's been doing some outsourcing to get cheap foreign labor ... hiring American programmers !
I recently returned from a visit to Canada where I stayed with my brother-in-law, who owns a small but very successful web development shop. He told me that due to the booming Canadian economy, he can no longer find experienced programmers at reasonable bill rates. So he's been doing some outsourcing to get cheap foreign labor ... hiring American programmers !
grinch
06-24 06:18 PM
Thanks gh0st, appreciate that.
2011 often wavy hair; hair
chintu25
08-16 01:42 PM
Feel free to email me or call me
more...
frostrated
12-01 11:37 AM
you can file a new application from scratch in EB2. you will not be able to use your husband's PD. And there will be no interuption to any case.
gccube
06-15 03:55 PM
It was applied in April at TSC and it was a substitution case.
more...
perm2gc
09-13 01:22 PM
If we do premium process, does this increase the change of rejection?
No..
No..
2010 2011 The medium curly hair
buehler
05-14 06:24 PM
agiridhar,
I was sarcastic, if you didn't get it. INS/government always had monopoly over giving out of GCs(the constitution guarantees it for them). They never had competition about it. You're kidding yourself to think that you can sue them on anti-trust laws. Some other laws may be but definitely not anti-trust laws.
I was sarcastic, if you didn't get it. INS/government always had monopoly over giving out of GCs(the constitution guarantees it for them). They never had competition about it. You're kidding yourself to think that you can sue them on anti-trust laws. Some other laws may be but definitely not anti-trust laws.
more...
bsbawa10
04-17 09:44 AM
Looks like nobody replied or liked the idea. How can I delete the thread ?
hair Beyonce Golden Brown Curly
americandesi
10-26 04:14 PM
There's no requirement for a person to be present in US while PERM or I-140 is getting processed.
During the AOS stage, a person may opt for Consular Processing or I-485. The former doesn’t require any presence in US whereas the latter does.
During the AOS stage, a person may opt for Consular Processing or I-485. The former doesn’t require any presence in US whereas the latter does.
more...
Appu
09-16 12:38 PM
There's a very good post here:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/8/29/1091/84205
Everyone on this forum should go read it and comment on it.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/8/29/1091/84205
Everyone on this forum should go read it and comment on it.
hot Naturally Curly Hair
gc_chahiye
11-17 07:43 PM
I have received FP notices both for my wife and myself for both 485 & 765. Code 3 ,2 . The question is :I dont know how FP process works. My wife has very smooth and sweaty hands. When i applied for Canadian immigration during FBI FP process even after n no. of attempts we couldnt get good prints on FP Sheet using INK. Ofcourse through speaking with Canadian Consulate they gave her an exemption over this. Now many of my friends have informed me that FP process is Electronic is this true?
I think she has no problem with electronic FP as US consulate could take her FP's when initially she went for H4 in i ndia. please comment.
its electronic, so you should be ok. They are also very patient, and try a lot ways to get clean prints (using wipes etc) [atleast at the Oakland ASC]
I think she has no problem with electronic FP as US consulate could take her FP's when initially she went for H4 in i ndia. please comment.
its electronic, so you should be ok. They are also very patient, and try a lot ways to get clean prints (using wipes etc) [atleast at the Oakland ASC]
more...
house eyonce hair beyonce Beyoncé
ajju
08-23 02:09 PM
AR-11 is filed manually and mailed. Everyone will use 41 cents stamp.. No way to track it if its really done or not.. Its in your interest only if you've pending applciation where you expect any replies to your address...
tattoo From her long wavy hair to her
gcformeornot
02-03 09:40 AM
I heard TCS is calling back many of their TL/PL/PM back to India. I heard it from 2-3 differrnt sources. Just wanted to see if anybody knows about it.
I personally know a person who is with TCS, he is a team lead or something.... asked to go back by TCS..... they are returning in mid Feb.....
I personally know a person who is with TCS, he is a team lead or something.... asked to go back by TCS..... they are returning in mid Feb.....
more...
pictures She has a naturally wavy hair,
prem_goel
11-18 06:11 PM
ha ha ha....well said...
ofcourse they have been wasting watching stupid games in TVs / Stadiums instead could use 'that' time to gain some new skills / learn new technologies that are required to survive in the job market
First of all, is your profile legitimate? It shows your PD as Dec'07 / EB3/India and you are in 485 processing??????
anyway, as long as some fools doesn't admit the facts and realize the changing world, all those forums / blogs / hatred etc; will be just a waste of their time. ofcourse they have been wasting watching stupid games in TVs / Stadiums instead could use 'that' time to gain some new skills / learn new technologies that are required to survive in the job market.
ofcourse they have been wasting watching stupid games in TVs / Stadiums instead could use 'that' time to gain some new skills / learn new technologies that are required to survive in the job market
First of all, is your profile legitimate? It shows your PD as Dec'07 / EB3/India and you are in 485 processing??????
anyway, as long as some fools doesn't admit the facts and realize the changing world, all those forums / blogs / hatred etc; will be just a waste of their time. ofcourse they have been wasting watching stupid games in TVs / Stadiums instead could use 'that' time to gain some new skills / learn new technologies that are required to survive in the job market.
dresses Long-Curly-Hair-styles-4
upuaut8
08-15 03:38 AM
It's easy, I've been doing it all week long.
Choose to export. When you do it comes up with a menu which lets you choose wireframe export. Also it allows you to choose which type of fills you want to use, as well as options for either the complete wireframe, or just the edges.
I'll be posting my first example of interesting uses for this effect, tomarrow some time.
Choose to export. When you do it comes up with a menu which lets you choose wireframe export. Also it allows you to choose which type of fills you want to use, as well as options for either the complete wireframe, or just the edges.
I'll be posting my first example of interesting uses for this effect, tomarrow some time.
more...
makeup Beyonce Knowles Copied
sircaustic
05-13 09:49 PM
If you have a receipt as proof that an extension application was filed on your behalf before expiration of your H1 then you have 240 days starting from the day your visa expires before you should get an extension. You will be out of status if your case is not resolved in the 240 days deadline. I cannot comment on the implications of missing out on a deadline for responding to the RFE.
girlfriend heidi klum short hair 2010.
DSLStart
05-23 02:50 PM
What You Told Us About Immigration Reform | The White House (http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/05/23/what-you-told-us-about-immigration-reform)
hairstyles hair TOP 4: Long Straight with
coopheal
07-07 11:36 AM
Form AR-11 asks for the date my stay in the United States will expire. What date should I use? Currently, I am on working on EAD (I-485 pending) and last entered US on AP.
Note: Sorry for a duplicate thread. I posted my previous one in I-140 section. :confused:
if you were paroled in put the date you were paroled in to. see I-94
Note: Sorry for a duplicate thread. I posted my previous one in I-140 section. :confused:
if you were paroled in put the date you were paroled in to. see I-94
Blog Feeds
05-05 06:50 AM
The Department of State (DOS) has issued a regulation that broadens the authority of consular officers to revoke a visa at any time subsequent to issuance of the visa, including when the individual is already in the U.S. Additionally, the regulation allows consular officers and designated officials within DOS to revoke a visa provisionally while considering a final visa revocation.
This rule is effective April 27, 2011. DOS did not issue the regulation through notice and comment rulemaking on the basis that it involves a foreign affairs function of the United States and, therefore, is exempt from those procedures.
Pursuant to section 221(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), DOS may determine that a visa should be revoked when information reveals that the applicant was originally, or has since become, ineligible or may be ineligible to possess a U.S. visa. In testimony before Congress in 2004, DOS stated that it had revoked 1,250 visas since September 11, 2001, based on information suggesting possible terrorist activities or links. Congress and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) have put pressure on DOS and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to improve their policies regarding visa revocations.
If DOS revokes an individual�s visa, the information will be uploaded into the Consular Lookout and Support System (CLASS) database and the foreign national may not use the visa for travel to the U.S. Though DOS will seek to notify the traveler, the revocation is effective irrespective of whether the foreign traveler knows about the revocation.
Separately, the INA allows the government to remove (i.e. deport) an individual whose nonimmigrant visa has been revoked under section 221(i). There is no judicial review of the decision to revoke the visa, but there is judicial review in the context of a removal proceeding if the visa revocation is the sole basis for removal.
Expect more denials at the port of entry to the US by individuals not aware that their visa has been revoked. I understand the need for more security but this may not be the way to go.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2011/05/visa_denials_regulation_expand.html)
This rule is effective April 27, 2011. DOS did not issue the regulation through notice and comment rulemaking on the basis that it involves a foreign affairs function of the United States and, therefore, is exempt from those procedures.
Pursuant to section 221(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), DOS may determine that a visa should be revoked when information reveals that the applicant was originally, or has since become, ineligible or may be ineligible to possess a U.S. visa. In testimony before Congress in 2004, DOS stated that it had revoked 1,250 visas since September 11, 2001, based on information suggesting possible terrorist activities or links. Congress and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) have put pressure on DOS and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to improve their policies regarding visa revocations.
If DOS revokes an individual�s visa, the information will be uploaded into the Consular Lookout and Support System (CLASS) database and the foreign national may not use the visa for travel to the U.S. Though DOS will seek to notify the traveler, the revocation is effective irrespective of whether the foreign traveler knows about the revocation.
Separately, the INA allows the government to remove (i.e. deport) an individual whose nonimmigrant visa has been revoked under section 221(i). There is no judicial review of the decision to revoke the visa, but there is judicial review in the context of a removal proceeding if the visa revocation is the sole basis for removal.
Expect more denials at the port of entry to the US by individuals not aware that their visa has been revoked. I understand the need for more security but this may not be the way to go.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2011/05/visa_denials_regulation_expand.html)
Blog Feeds
12-13 11:20 PM
Immigration Lawyers Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
The January 2011 Visa Bulletin shows significant retrogression of family-based categories with priority dates falling back as much as one to three years. The 1st preference category (unmarried children of U.S. citizens) shows an increased wait from 5 years to 6 years. The 2A preference category (spouses and children of legal permanent residents) suffers the largest setback with an increase from 4 months to 3 years, while the 2B preference category (unmarried adult children of legal permanent residents) experiences an increase from 5 1/2 to 8 years. The 3rd preference category (married children of U.S. citizens) shows an increase from 8 1/2 years to 10 years. The 4th preference category (brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens) was the only family-based category unaffected by the retrogression, remaining at a 9 year wait.
Employment-based categories did not experience any retrogression and are as follows: EB-1 remains current for all countries; EB-2 remains current, except for India (May 2006) and China (June 2006); EB-3 is at Mar. 2005 for all countries, except for India (Feb. 2002), China (Dec. 2003), and Mexico (April 2003); EB-3 other workers is at April 2003 for all countries, except India (Feb. 2002); EB-4, religious workers, EB-5, and targeted employment areas and regional centers are all current.
To view the January 2011 visa bulletin, see http://travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_5212.html
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~4/MqJ3r3NtuVk
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~3/MqJ3r3NtuVk/january_2011_visa_bulletin_shows_major_retrogressi on_in_family-based_categories.html)
The January 2011 Visa Bulletin shows significant retrogression of family-based categories with priority dates falling back as much as one to three years. The 1st preference category (unmarried children of U.S. citizens) shows an increased wait from 5 years to 6 years. The 2A preference category (spouses and children of legal permanent residents) suffers the largest setback with an increase from 4 months to 3 years, while the 2B preference category (unmarried adult children of legal permanent residents) experiences an increase from 5 1/2 to 8 years. The 3rd preference category (married children of U.S. citizens) shows an increase from 8 1/2 years to 10 years. The 4th preference category (brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens) was the only family-based category unaffected by the retrogression, remaining at a 9 year wait.
Employment-based categories did not experience any retrogression and are as follows: EB-1 remains current for all countries; EB-2 remains current, except for India (May 2006) and China (June 2006); EB-3 is at Mar. 2005 for all countries, except for India (Feb. 2002), China (Dec. 2003), and Mexico (April 2003); EB-3 other workers is at April 2003 for all countries, except India (Feb. 2002); EB-4, religious workers, EB-5, and targeted employment areas and regional centers are all current.
To view the January 2011 visa bulletin, see http://travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_5212.html
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~4/MqJ3r3NtuVk
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~3/MqJ3r3NtuVk/january_2011_visa_bulletin_shows_major_retrogressi on_in_family-based_categories.html)
No comments:
Post a Comment